Legal AI that cansurface the contradiction buried in the other side's file.surface the contradiction buried in the other side's file.surface the contradiction buried in the other side's file. answer any question, cited to the exact judgment page. tell you if a precedent is still good law. draft your petition in court format, from your matter. track every hearing and limitation date, from eCourts. read a 500-page paper-book in minutes. run your whole practice — matters, tasks and billing. work in all 22 Indian languages.

The five stages

1. 01 · Research — Ask, and get verified case law.

   A research workspace scoped to the matter. The good-law citator is fed into the answer itself — an authority tagged overruled or per incuriam is excluded at generation time, not flagged in a footnote afterwards.

   • Good-law citator flags overruled and doubted judgments
   • Precedent chains walk citations forward and backward
   • Every claim cited inline to its source
   • Hybrid semantic and lexical search across judgments
   • Overruled authorities excluded at generation time
2. 02 · Draft — Built on your matter, not a blank page.

   Template fields bind to real matter data — court, case number, CNR, parties, limitation date — with no AI in the substitution path. So a draft can be wrong about the law, but never about the case number.

   • Fields bind to real matter data, no AI substitution
   • Approval ladder: submit, review, request changes, approve
   • Version history with per-version restore
   • Threaded comments with replies and resolve
   • Export to .docx, import from Google Drive
3. 03 · Prepare — Everything settled before it goes in.

   A matter sits in a proposed state until it clears activation. Court fees are computed from the statutory schedule for the forum, and the filing type is picked from a real taxonomy rather than typed into a free-text box.

   • Statutory court-fee estimate by forum, with exemptions
   • Filing type picked from a 99-entry taxonomy
   • Proposed state before a proceeding goes live
   • Nine-gate activation checklist on every matter
4. 04 · Track — Hearings & limitation, synced.

   A sweep never moves a date on aggregates alone, and most sources are forbidden from ever telling you “not listed”. Losing a date requires the sweep and the hearing-day check to fail together.

   • Cause lists confirm item number and court room
   • Limitation clock recalculates with Section 4 holidays
   • Preponement sweeps catch dates moved without warning
   • Nightly watchdog flags cases missing a future date
   • Alerts on WhatsApp, email and in-app
   • Hearing dates push to your Google Calendar
5. 05 · Bill — A ledger that balances.

   Double-entry and append-only — a correction is a reversal, never an edit. Online collection settles straight to the firm's own account: Jagriq is not a payment aggregator and never pools client money.

   • Nine fee models, including per-appearance and milestone
   • Double-entry matter ledger, append-only
   • Fees, disbursements, payments, refunds, write-offs
   • Client advances applied and set off cross-matter
   • UPI collection settling to the firm, never to Jagriq